agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
this is why you don't kill a spec less than a year after you birth it. Trust on building on FC has gone to 0 for many of us who simply don't have the time and bandwith to keep updating our little tools.] Frames are dead, long live frames. PS: The new stuff only has frames on name, its just mobile web apps just like telegram and worldcoin. don't treat us like fools please tysm
8 replies
4 recasts
25 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
I think I felt the same way until I adjusted my perspective: building on FC right now is early adoption. It’s just part of the course when the network still isn’t figured out yet. I definitely wouldn’t build a startup around FC right now, but for the occasional hack and social experiment, I’m here for it.
4 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
I think there is something to be said regarding the naming of Frames v2 I understand that it’s the next version of building on warpcast, but it’s so different to frames v1 that it arguably doesn’t even warrant the name anymore The naming in itself feels like a clear intent to kill the original frames spec which is unfortunate
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Frames v1 still work — if they don’t please share an example where it is broken.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
i think if cast / composer actions, frames and v2 frames were all interoperable and could summon + interact w one another it'd be great they're not and that's unfortunate
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

snail pfp
snail
@snail
literally just copied telegram and tried to say it's groundbreaking tech lol. bozo team.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

L3MBDA pfp
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
NASA-grade feels
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Awkward Seal pfp
Awkward Seal
@awkwardseal
Couldnt agree more, honestly.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
also @atlas change to @dwr.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction