daos

So you don’t buy the meme that AGI would prefer to operate on blockchains rails because of their universality, security, programmability, etc.?

AGI will decisively obsolete blockchains, but it's likely it'll be obsolete for all but 1 or 2 usecases well before then (few years) as non-blockchain P2P, ZK, trust infrastructure develops

Where blockchains are limited to only objective strict consensus, AGI(s) can achieve complex, subjective consensus - "AGI will use blockchains" is a silly, nonsensical meme not unlike "telegraphs will use internet" 

Valuable cryptoassets like BTC and ETH will live on after blockchains are obsolete because, as I've said a hundred times before, this is a socioeconomic movement, and tech is only means to an end. The tech will be replaced, the socioeconomics will live on.

Caveat: "AGI" is in itself a meme, so I'm assuming it'll do what people popularly expect

I see the point here, a counter view I have been exploring (still early and may have mistakes) is: 

AGI likely wants to guarantee its livelihood and as long as it’s in a centralized server it is at risk; as such, it will likely need a blockchain-like structure in order to remain immutable. Advancements in ZK, P2P etc are great, but immutability will always require blockchains in order to preserve state across multiple devices right?

lore @optimism | ex: @coinbase | views are my own | what if it all worked out? 

why would AGI seek to be immutable? humans want to live forever, but we wanna be resilient, not turn ourselves into statues