Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

wylin💎↑ pfp
wylin💎↑
@wylin
imo the design and incentives of $nouns are fundamentally and irredeemably broken even blacklisting them from the quorum count, the token only serves to create bag holders if esports asks for another 3 Nouns to liquidate and giveaway, it’s highly unlikely 3 people end up with 1m $nouns each, much more likely they’re spread across a bunch of people what’s their incentive to hold, to participate with Nouns beyond surface level grift for the sake of more tokens? there’s no use case for this token other than to sell it for harder forms of money or roll into your next shitcoin play. if incentives to hold existed, that transaction history wouldn’t be bloody red from all the sells
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨ pfp
⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨
@bigshotklim
If we offer exclusive product only available through $nouns the market for our product shrinks dramatically too. how do we solve for this?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wylin💎↑ pfp
wylin💎↑
@wylin
not there is a solve tbh personally skeptical that a pseudo-money will be allowable under the DUNA, it’s a nonprofit association regardless of 501c3 even if it is, does anyone actually want to accept and spend Zimbabwe-esque fake money? if they do, are businesses ready and willing to deal with the accounting and tax issues of converting it into fiat? i think Ben Latsko has some good ideas re: access pass/ ticketing for events, not so sure about using it as money though
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨ pfp
⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨
@bigshotklim
Yea I agree.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction