Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
I believe the social layer of governance is the most harmful layer. I’m a huge advocate for private voting, also anonymous feedback…. Why? Because ANYTIME you leave feedback positive or negative you get DMs…. It’s making me just want to vote & not say anything, but I feel I owe it to the proposers to provide feedback, but also do not want to deal with the backlash of providing feedback. Dammed if you do, dammed if you don’t….. but Anon activities eliminate these issues, we should also reset the culture to not take voting against a proposal so personally. An against vote does not equal an I Hate You, it’s a rework and repurpose if it doesn’t pass. 🫡
6 replies
0 recast
23 reactions
⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨
@bigshotklim
Sometimes the builders have tunnel vision and not thought about what an alternative prop may look like. Comments like “too expensive” or “think of a different strategy that costs less and maybe not as ambitious” when the proposer may be a thought leader in their space and has a clear roadmap for successful execution and delivery tend to scare people away from building here in my opinion. how do We do this better?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
That’s on the builder to check their ego. I’ve seen a lot of folks pass through here with big egos & get upset if a vote doesn’t go their way. That’s not all on us. It may just not be the right fit at the time. It’s a humbling process.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨
@bigshotklim
yep 1000% agreed. I am not speaking of anyone specific just a general observation from quie a bit of experience. I do think that there needs to be some sort of a road map to people places and things that can guide curious people a little better. maybe a better UI on the main site and if that sunsets then where?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
I like what @mikegood has been working on for that. When’s that launching Mike?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
