Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
GPT o1, so far, sucks for code as far as I can tell. Itās insanely verbose and goes off the rails just as fast, but now for longer, than previous models. It has been awesome for conceptual brainstorming and system architecture. I much prefer Claude 3.5 or gpt 4, Iāll take 4o for boiler plate specifically Anyone else writing code having better experiences with o1 preview?
11 replies
4 recasts
27 reactions
Abubakarš©
@bigbenz
For me, when Iām engaging in technically-intense works I go with Claude Would got 4o give me equal amount of productivity?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Theyāre the same, I didnāt see anything that would have lead me to believe the hype of Claude being a game changed to the 4o GPT 4 & 4o = Claude 3.5
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Abubakarš©
@bigbenz
š I admire how blunt you are, in your reviews I am actually been strongly persuaded by a friend to ditch Claude for gpt 4o like there was massive upgrade I wondered what he mightāve seen differently š¤
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
ššš¼ I will use gpt 4o when I need a complete reproduction of a file with N changes applied. Claude seems to be a bit more token efficient for its output which I like while building and donāt like while doing fine details that cause a couple changes across an entire file or boilerplate type work. With cursor you can just click click swap, so itās chill
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
