Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
to be clear leaving this bubbling undercurrent unaddressed to fester in the shadows and shame will only result in churn of some healthy, quality and valid contributors to this network sunlight is the best disinfectant official nuanced discussions need to be held, and asap, @dwr.eth, @v for the future of the network
1 reply
3 recasts
13 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
genuinely trying to understand - what's to discuss? they're pretty clear about handling bots (some $$$ to stem the massive tide, filter the bots that pay, focusing on user defaults vs power user tools) they share DAU #s and get slammed regularly if they shared a qDAU # too they'd also get slammed about defining it?
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊 pfp
Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊
@syed
Yeah I’m wondering where to look for this bubbling undercurrent. Genuinely
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
for starters, go see what @ghostlinkz.eth and @geoffgolberg are trying to discuss
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
i've been following along and while getting unfollowed by @dwr.eth and @v is def an emotional event, i also think that nobody is obligated to engage with anyone on the internet (including the founders of social apps) full disclosure i did an outcaster w @ghostlinkz.eth and @geoffgolberg and I have DMed a bit
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊 pfp
Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊
@syed
It’s infuriating the DAU argument because the simple answer is to come up with a good definition yourself. We’d all happily adopt it but it’s either good enough or not relevant enough to care day to day. As for the ghostlink @dwr.eth and @v unfollowing I understand how devastating that can be and sympathize.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction