Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA for future "shock images" Warpcast will nerf folks for explicit images. It's not deterministic, our judgement. This isn't a court. - I'll ask the user to delete the cast - If they don't, I'll nerf on Warpcast To be clear: the cast exists at the protocol. Similar to websites, Google doesn't have to index you.
33 replies
6 recasts
91 reactions

Jason Goldberg  pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
Not picking a fight. Genuinely curious. (And ❤️ debate) If users have option to unfollow, hide, mute, block, why does client need to nerf? So long as it’s not harming or threatening another person, why take such a heavy hand? I’m not saying you are wrong, just trying to understand your logic and policy.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. Explicit images will get us banned from the App Store -- so until we have automated systems to flag / hide by default, don't want to deal with that 2. We use Imgur for image hosting, so if you're uploading from Warpcast affecting our API access 3. my pov 80%+ of users are fine with our judgement for now
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Landon pfp
Landon
@lndnnft
Not Dan, but I think content that goes for that “shock” content, i.e. gore, violence, etc… can be easily harmful to others just in terms of triggering bad past memories, causing flashbacks, etc… just not helpful to the overall vibe. Unfollowing/hiding/etc… requires first being exposed to said content
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction