We are indeed currently in the process of large changes to EF leadership structure, which has been ongoing for close to a year. Some of this has already been executed on and made public, and some is still in progress.

What we're trying to achieve is primarily the following goals:

* Improve level of technical expertise within EF leadership
* Improve two-way communications and ties between EF leadership and the ecosystem actors, old and new, that it is our role to support: users (individual and institutional), app devs, wallets, L2s
* Bring in fresh talent, improve execution ability and speed
* Become more actively supportive of app builders, and make sure important values and inalienable rights (esp privacy, open source, censorship resistance) are a reality for users including at the app layer
* Continue to increase our use of decentralized and privacy tech and the Ethereum chain, including for payments and treasury management

...

Not everyone agrees with this, but I’m all for it. 

@vitalik.eth  is one of the the top 10 geniuses of our generation. Just like Elon and Zuck and Trump get to cook anyway they want, @vitalik.eth  has earned the right to chef his way 

I trust him 100% and respect the ethos

chef at moxie.xyz | Moxie is your onchain AI assistant—analyzing transactions, unlocking social alpha, and executing trades on your behalf.

He’s literally a net huge massive negative

His goals are different than yours. He’s building the decentralized world computer. You’re holding a bag.

Just because you agree with his utter nonsense beliefs doesnt make it 1) smart 2) popular 3) positive for the token
Its the anti

I’m not referring to the token though. I’m referring to the tech.

Smart was listed 1)for a reason. The guy has led ETH down a losers pathway to second place.   Scaling without major layer 1 improvements was a retarded plan and the price is simply voters expressing their opinions