ethrd

Here is a new RIG Open Problem on the specification of a Multiplicity gadget in the context of Ethereum’s Gasper consensus. Good problem for a consensus researcher interested in censorship-resistance!

Here is a new RIG Open Problem on the specification of a Multiplicity gadget in the context of Ethereum’s Gasper consensus. Good problem for a consensus researcher interested in censorship-resistance! https://efdn.notion.site/ROP-9-Multiplicity-gadgets-for-censorship-resistance-7def9d354f8a4ed5a0722f4eb04ca73b

Robust Incentives Group @ Ethereum Foundation

https://rig.ethereum.org

How does this compare to multiplicity at the proposer level? I understand it would add a lot of overhead to consensus, but the benefits seem large.

Rocket Pool Community Advocate, former pDAO treasurer, shared oDAO member, incentives management committee, $DIVA delegate, rugged by Musk

Is your LST safe?

Not sure what you mean by “at proposer level”? Many proposers making one block each, and one of them getting selected to propose the block?

Right, there is parallel proposers by @domothy for instance, the issue (to me) is the subjectivity and latency of either “first-proposed” or “highest-MEV”, single leader can be more tractable then. The spirit of the ROP is to bound the leader’s agency in making their block

Yup! I think the idea I heard was first submission or highest MEV amount of the group.