Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
reading the Canceling of the American Mind and the intro outlines how both the political left + right have built rhetorical defenses that avoid actual debate. the left’s: complex, layering personal attacks to block any criticism the right’s: simpler, dismissing experts, journalists and Trump critics both rely on what the authors dub "The Great Untruth of Ad Hominem,” which is that “bad people only have bad opinions.” we see this happening across the board with the H1B debate: calling someone a billionaire, big tech, indian, white, MAGA, second generation, etc. to refute their points. society as a whole argues for power and status using identity politics. seemingly everyone is guilty.
11 replies
35 recasts
120 reactions

AJ pfp
AJ
@awedjob.eth
How might we affect a positive change in this environment? If my goal is to be right/correct then what benefit is it to “win” that argument if I have no power or influence to enact a positive change? If my goal is to seize power no matter the price, am I morally bankrupt and incapable of doing what is right?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction