thomas

I am now running a trade deficit of $200 per month with OpenAI. Could someone economically illiterate please tell me if I should start levying tariffs on ChatGPT

Aviator, diver, Etherean, nexialist, PhD in aviation ∩ climate science | Host of /diving /ethfinance /eth-staker /geopolitics /science /singapore /thomas

I ran it on o3-mini, and interestingly, the reasoning steps showed that it understood the question to be facetious and/or hypothetical, and yet the final reply it gave was a completely boring and academic lecture about tariffs in general and how $200 was small change compared to nation states

There is nothing more powerful in this world than words.

I ran it on o3-mini, and interestingly, the reasoning steps showed that it understood the question to be facetious and/or hypothetical, and yet the final reply it gave was a completely boring and academic lecture about tariffs in general and how $200 was small change compared to nation states

https://chatgpt.com/share/67fd2311-6140-8005-b4a9-4d2b4086e916

Full-stack digital product consultant @ BoundCorp.net - eng @daylight

yes, apply a 200% tarrif, for every $200 you import, add another $400 payable back to yourself

ginaknowsbest

What do you get for free when you sign up for askgina.ai

- ChatGPT Pro: $200 
- Perplexity Pro: $20 
- Gemini Advanced: $19.99 
- Claude Pro: $20 
- Coingecko + Dexscreener 
- A built in wallet with cross-chain execution

you can use homegrown local products instead of running a trade deficit ser:

you can use homegrown local products instead of running a trade deficit ser:

https://warpcast.com/sidshekhar/0xdea7d349

I suggest you bring back LLM manufacturing to your servers and rent it to openai

it’s the only way