Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> ETH needs its own Michael Saylor With all due respect to @sassal.eth and others who hold this view: I don’t think it does. The only reason BTC maxis love Saylor is because he holds the promise of pumping their bags. It’s a Faustian growth hack, though. If BTC moons, Saylor becomes its natural figurehead and spokesperson. If BTC dumps hard, $MSTR becomes a single point of cascading failure. Either outcome is terrible. It would be much more antifragile for BTC to achieve the same scarcity by being near-evenly spread across a large population. As for ETH, there’s only enough supply for every human on this planet to own 0.015 of it (~$50). Imagine a world with far fewer whales and much more krill — true abundance. To repeat: we don’t need a Saylor. Instead, we need to organically put ETH into as many hands as possible, which itself requires that we keep increasing its utility https://x.com/sassal0x/status/1870620451917209603
8 replies
10 recasts
72 reactions
Caster Cat #648 🎩🧾
@ariansh.eth
Makes sense! Although I do feel like eth is better suited for that type of a strategy when you factor in the staking yield
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sassal.eth 🎩⛽
@sassal.eth
I never said that Ethereum "needs" a Saylor-like figure so I don't know why you're putting words in my mouth?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stuart
@olystuart
Unfortunately Eth does have it's up and coming "Michael Saylor" and it's name is BlackRock, and if it gets as much Eth as it wants, Eth is going to be worthless to the open source, decentralized, censorship resistant world we wanted to build with it. I'm with you, we should want it to be as widely distributed as possible instead.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sujit 🇮🇳 🎩
@0xsujit
ETH has their own Michael Saylor, it's the called Ethereum Foundation. Except instead of buying they sell.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
OTTI🎨🖌🎩
@zeuzc
I appreciate your perspective and largely agree with your argument. Ethereum doesn’t need a Michael Saylor because its value proposition fundamentally differs from Bitcoin’s. While Bitcoin’s primary narrative revolves around being “digital gold” and a store of value, Ethereum thrives as a platform for innovation and utility, where value is derived from the diverse applications built on top of it.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
accountless
@accountless.eth
i do love saylor for saying the system is rigged against you. you work 9-5 pay your taxes and all that and only incrementally inch up the financial ladder. that doesn't impact what you are saying it above. crypto just makes it easier to gamble, and holding can be a path to uin.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Timjanssen.eth
@timjanssen.eth
I think what saylor is doing is actially harmful to btc and becomming a big risk
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
📿 zach harris🎋
@zachharris.eth
He did give micro strategy shareholders, a $300 million bump on .75 yield … not too shabby for a little bit of aping imo
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
