Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sourav currently at DevCon
@sourav
a nice take on front-end frameworks! 👇 https://www.abeautifulsite.net/posts/thoughts-on-framework-churn/
5 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Spencer
@spencer-sch
I've been more and more interested in headless UI components and really like the idea of the flexibility of web component based components. I hadn't heard of Shoelace before and now thoroughly intend to use it. Thanks for sharing the article!
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
artlu
@artlu
why choose Shoelace rather than one of the Big, Battle-Tested, and easy-to-hire-or-gpt like Bootstrap, Material, Ant, Chakra pick the least cringe and go with it?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Spencer
@spencer-sch
Because it's new (to me) and interesting? I've used bootstrap and material before. The aspect of Shoelace that caught my eye was the universality of the web component base. I'd need to do some research to see how the other libraries you mentioned compare. My reply was born of excitement - not well balanced research.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
artlu
@artlu
I assumed Material was universal enough to bend the standards as necessary lol. mainly wanted to know what was overlooked if anything
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Spencer
@spencer-sch
Material also comes with a whole design system. Headless libraries like Shoelace allow for complete style customization; if that's what you want. DaisyUI would be another example.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
