Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
Decent Bookmarks is in beta! Questions for client devs: - does API make sense for you - would you consider including decentralized bookmarks in your FC client - if not, what would you need to see TL;DR - Cast Action adds bookmark, removes if already there - data encrypted at rest - clients responsible for UI 1/5
6 replies
5 recasts
13 reactions
Dan Romero
@artlu
2/5 - N entities share perms to read+decrypt - M entities share perms to write+encrypt - data stored on my "L4" (a database) - will settle to L2 or L3, testnet contracts first - identifier is anonymized via salted hash - secrets stay offchain
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
Privacy considerations: - when any client decrypts, that user's data is revealed and tied to FID - when keys leak, all encrypted data is open (but not linked with FID) until rotated - smart contracts can be forked/redeployed with different secrets In Beta, consider that personal data is OPEN to any developer 3/5
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
4/5 For more sensitive data, can encrypt the payload with a set of user secrets (more complex UX). For more public data, can decrease security by skipping encryption. Use cases: PINNED CASTS TO PROFILE, Pinned Casts to Channel. Bookmarks for fid 6546 are currently open + unencrypted. All others are encrypted
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
5/5 I commit for rest of 2024 to help migrate any user data to FC if that use case makes it into the protocol. Links: - frame to install cast action - endpoint: GET to read data, POST to add, DELETE to remove - ask privately for access tokens - GC to discuss. My DCs are open
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@artlu
short video (9s) showing the cast action
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@artlu
https://decent-bookmarks-cast-action.artlu.workers.dev Join the GC here https://warpcast.com/~/group/AwXkv2N5s4pUw1w34XsoMA The API is exposed here (your FID will be encrypted) https://decent-bookmarks.artlu.xyz/?fid=6546
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions