Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

arctu pfp
arctu
@arctu.eth
My issue with vitalik’s new take is it normalises rolling back the chain. “Oh we’ll just roll back the chain like we said we would” … quantum emergency y’all But if you do it for one thing you can do it for everything. Soon even polkadot will be asking … what about 4448 et al Is there no better way?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Isn't it understood even in bitcoin that a quantum emergency could justify hard forks and arbitrary crazy actions to protect people's money? Though I guess in bitcoin the rules are that arbitrary rollbacks are potentially permissible if majority of miners can be convinced to go along with them?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions