Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
arctu
@arctu.eth
My issue with vitalik’s new take is it normalises rolling back the chain. “Oh we’ll just roll back the chain like we said we would” … quantum emergency y’all But if you do it for one thing you can do it for everything. Soon even polkadot will be asking … what about 4448 et al Is there no better way?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Isn't it understood even in bitcoin that a quantum emergency could justify hard forks and arbitrary crazy actions to protect people's money? Though I guess in bitcoin the rules are that arbitrary rollbacks are potentially permissible if majority of miners can be convinced to go along with them?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
If we fully switch to account abstraction then I would endorse "no rollbacks even in a quantum emergency"
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
arctu
@arctu.eth
I fully support that! (Thanks for the reply Vitalik!!!!)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction