Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Agree. EOAs definitely not DOA anytime soon. https://x.com/0xfoobar/status/1697044787050791204?s=46
6 replies
3 recasts
19 reactions
ari
@apyh
I strongly disagree - I think in the next 5 years, an EoA will only exist as a signer for an AA wallet. less complexity is enabled by things like bundling, gas fee abstractions, social sign in , two-factor authentication, all of which are account abstraction native technologies.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
I think there's a lot of usefulness to AA but none of what you listed is only possible with AA and 2fa and social sign in isn't enhanced by AA over offchain crypto. The big use case would seem to be app specific wallets which I think is huge. But I'm not convinced for primary accounts.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ari
@apyh
🤔 how do you do gas fee abstractions for EoAs without manually integrating that gas abstraction into every single smart contract?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
Yeah I didn't list gas fee abstraction and bundling for that reason; it's not practical. But it's also not practical to sponsor a user's gas on mainnet and I think boring mainnet use cases are still going to be a lot of users' onboarding. We'll see. I hope AA wins soon, but I think it could take a while.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ari
@apyh
I think being able to pay gas fees in an arbitrary token is a really powerful abstraction! Having a user only hold a stable coin but still be able to make transactions is super powerful, and IMO breaks one of the biggest onboarding barriers: being forced to hold a volatile token for gas fees
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
