Angelika Kollin
@angelikakollin
Did we reach the End?
5 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
Renée Campbell
@reneecampbell
Feels close doesn’t it
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Jessi ⌐◨-◨ 🤫🌭
@zwillow
They can have their AI slop. I will continue to enjoy your GOLD.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Luigi Stranieri
@luigistranieri
Looks more like the bottom
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Stuart
@olystuart
Hope not, I understand bias' frustration but there's always going to be some BS going on in mainstream culture. AI slop flooded the timeline for a couple days but it's really not everyone, a lot of us are just doing our normal thing and it'll pass. 🤷♂️
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Sally
@sallysharifi
Oh no 😭
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Inna Mosina
@innamosina
I completely disagree! For people, for the audience, it always matters how a piece of art was created. Take, for example, knitted clothing—one made by hand and one made in a factory. The factory-made one might even be more beautiful and precise, but people will often prefer handmade knitting. Or paintings—modern printing technologies can now print textured images on canvas that mimic brushstrokes, but which painting is more valuable? Of course, the one made by hand. And most importantly, if a person honestly states the method used to create an image—whether it's AI-generated or a photograph—and if it is something unique, both can be considered a work of art.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hadi 🎩
@hadi1370
As someone who works with AI, I gotta say this is spot on. At least when it comes to photography—the connection to the real world matters. AI-generated "photos" shouldn’t be compared to actual photography because they don’t carry that soul or the photographer’s unique vision. AI might be a game-changer for graphic designers or even animators, but not for photography. But here’s the thing—real art lovers will never see a photographer’s meaningful work the same way as AI junk. And honestly, for a photographer, those genuine viewers matter way more than the rest. I mean, just like e-books never really killed paper books, AI won’t replace real photography either.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
