Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
This would be a great reversion Right now, deciding to be a client (ie. an app that can write to hubs) requires not only betting on FC, but making users pay before they can use your app By getting rid of the latter, it reduces risk to just platform risk and likely will enable FC read-only apps to become clients more easily
3 replies
0 recast
32 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
the onchain cost of adding a signer is basically negligible today so i don't think it will make a difference in that sense tbh (most apps are already subsidising this cost) the cost to onboard net new users is a much higher barrier for farcaster apps imo
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Oh interesting — I thought apps passed this cost onto users I might be mistaken, thanks for flagging! Either way, not having to have a hot wallet sending meta transactions seems like a win
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
we do — you can sponsor signers
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions