Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Was talking to a founder friend yesterday who has looked into using FC as part of their gtm (they are a crypto infra co) He said the team came to the conclusion that 80% of the folks they could target here, they can get by targeting CT, hence it would be mostly redundant spend with little ROI I countered that it’s not the intersection that matters, but the difference. Meaning — the 20% of folks that are active here, but not active on Twitter, are the highest value cohort Reason being — it’s a different culture. This culture values authenticity and showing up for each other more than the general crypto population. Smaller quantity but much higher quality He grokked it but I could tell it would still be hard for him to get buy-in from the rest of his team. Sadly, I think this realization doesn’t scale well, but needs to be experienced or learned via wom from a trusted party Not sure how best to communicate “the vibes” other than one person at a time cc @kia.eth the resident vibe lord
11 replies
7 recasts
47 reactions
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
I mean, yeah People are nicer in small towns because they will likely run into you again Doesn’t mean they don’t gossip about you when you’re not there, or that there aren’t problems with the town But as @noun839.eth said, this group is very supportive of people who are earnestly building things
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
I feel you but I don’t have that same experience with Merkle, I’ve been critical of several things publicly and I find them more receptive than 90% of startups in their position I agree it’s harder to call things out here, but that’s not bc of Merkle. As an example, Degen people did not like me shitting on the L3 I flagged it in order to caution people from aping, but most of my criticisms were unheeded until the downtime / reorg fiasco
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
