Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-devs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andrei O.
@andrei0x309
I find the implementation very good. It is much better and is very similar to how is how I described it in the first place, simpler with an agnostic `farcaster://` deep link so it can be picked up by any client, with no centralized server and support for both auth key, and custody key, this is the correct open/permissionless implementaion previous one had a lot of issues, that would have created roadblocks for potential non-warpcast clients that want to implement SIWF. The only thing missing is some concrete dates to avoid breaking changes, it would be better if the old SIWF(Warpcast links) would also be kept a bit for backward compatibility until people migrate, 1-2 months IMO would be enough for most people that use this.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions