fc-oss

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

I respect your opinion, it might be true but in the long run this can bite.

Nobody stops anyone to add any kind of recovery to a implementation of a wallet.

You already allow PK export from both custody address and warplet address, which means if PK is compromised you can't do recovery.

Seamless recovery makes a lot of sense when you custody the account sure but it has little value when primary recovery is wallet export.

It already has some drawbacks, for example people that want to use the custody address in warplet and mini apps can't, and they need to either use CB or Rainbow as preferred wallet 

If warplet would have been made with the app library that would not have been a issue.

Using the internal library had no limitations it just would have costed more resources.

Swaps in the Warpcast Wallet are not working right now due an issue with an API provider.

A smaller bite came faster:

https://warpcast.com/andrei0x309/0x8eb35999
https://warpcast.com/v/0xe4d25db9

Software developer, open source enthusiast, privacy advocate.

Clear Wallet Open-source privacy focused wallet: https://clear-wallet.flashsoft.eu/


Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Not today, is not like I've not seen specific Privy issues in the past, I've worked with projects that use Privy, especially when they were practically unknown.

I don't have anything to say against Privy I think is a great solution( although its services are expensive) but for smaller projects.

Any larger project when it comes to anything related to security should at most use open-source libraries, case and point if Bybit would not have used Safe as their multi-sig UI, 1.4 billion would have not been stolen by a compromised dev of a third-party provider.