Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””

@am3

2335 Following
1320 Followers


Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/16/2025) Active Addresses: 645.80K (−45.73%) Transaction Count: 7.12M (−6.44%) TVL: $9.96B (−3.12%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.81B (−0.78%) Revenue: $175.46K (+60.92%) Paid to L1: $9.35K (+2755.92%) Onchain Profit: $166.12K (+52.74%) Transaction Cost: $0.002 (+100.00%) There were fewer users, and fewer transactions happened today on Base. Both dropped a lot. There is, so the TVL of the project decreases, and the stablecoin bucks a little. But wait positive news: revenue and profits were up nicely! The network had made more revenue despite low activity. And the average transaction cost to Ethereum (L1) also doubled (albeit still super cheap) So in short: Less activity but way, way higher earnings for the network.
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/13/2025) Active Addresses: 1.19M (−7.75%) Transaction Count: 7.61M (−1.42%) TVL: $10.28B (+4.47%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.84B (−0.52%) Revenue: $109.04K (+34.67%) Paid to L1: $327.38 (−91.25%) Onchain Profit: $108.71K (+40.75%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00) Today fewer people used the network (−7.75%) and did transactions (−1.42% ). However, this reflected into a slight increase (+4.47%) in the total value locked (TVL), suggesting that more money flows into this ecosystem. Value of stablecoins fell slightly (−0.52%) Revenue and profit, however, grew tremendously, which means the network made more money with fewer users. The payment to Ethereum fell significantly (−91.25%) which also increased profit. In short: the network earned more, and also its performance looked better, even if activity slumped somewhat.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/12/2025) Active Addresses: 1.29M (+16.22%) Transaction Count: 7.72M (+6.92%) TVL: $9.84B (−1.01%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.86B (+0.26%) Revenue: $80.98K (−42.92%) Paid to L1: $3.74K (−73.61%) Onchain Profit: $77.24K (−39.54%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Today, more people used the network (+16.22%) and made more transactions (+6.92%). However, total locked value (TVL) dipped slightly (−1.01%), possibly indicating some money moved out of the ecosystem. Stablecoin TVL remained nearly flat (+0.26%). Despite gaining users, the income (−42.92%) and earnings (−39.54%) decreased greatly. Similarly, Ethereum (−73.61%) received less funds to be paid. Transaction cost remained extremely low. In essence: more activity, less money made. This indicates that users could be performing more micro or lower value transactions, possibly in social or low-fee applications.
3 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
Today is a good day to build on @base
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/10/2025) Active Addresses: 1.11M (+105.24%) Transaction Count: 7.22M (+6.02%) TVL: $9.94B (+7.11%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.85B (+0.79%) Revenue: $141.94K (-25.06%) Paid to L1: $14.17K (+526.99%) Onchain Profit: $127.77K (-31.73%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Active addresses surged too (+105.24%) and the transaction count increased as well (+6.02%) meaning more users and higher activity. TVL (+7.11%) and stable TVL (+0.79%) also increased, indicating higher liquidity in the network. However, revenue (-25.06%) and profit (-31.73%) were down, even as activity grew. A large portion of payments went to L1 +526.99% which could have limited profits. Transaction cost remained constant. In short, the network became with more users and more money on it, but earned less likely as most transactions were either low-fee or not very high-value.
2 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
Anybody is OG holder? I'm a holder for ever
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/09/2025) Active Addresses: 540.92K (-33.16%) Transaction Count: 6.81M (-2.71%) TVL: $9.28B (-3.83%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.82B (-0.26%) Revenue: $189.44K (+79.38%) Paid to L1: $2.26K (-59.50%) Onchain Profit: $187.18K (+87.09%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Fewer active addresses (-33.16%) and transaction count (-2.71%). This indicates less users with less on-chain actions. TVL (-3.83%) and stable TVL (-0.26%) were also down, which meant that some money was leaving the network. However, revenue (+79.38%) and profit (+87.09%) increased strongly, so txn cost remained constant. L1 received less payments (-59.50%), thus more value remained on Base. And it processed fewer transactions, too, but made more profit — presumably as larger or more expensive transactions by fewer users. This could indicate that DeFi and cross-chain use remained active, despite indication of overall less engagement.
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
GM guys
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/08/2025) Active Addresses: 809.17K(+23.52%) Transaction Count: 7.00M(-8.74%) TVL: $9.65B(0.00%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.83B(-2.05%) Revenue: $105.60K(-71.14%) Paid to L1: $5.58K(-54.53%) Onchain Profit: $100.02K(-71.71%) Transaction Cost: $0.001(-50.00%) The number of active addresses also grew strongly(+23.52%), while the total number of transactions that took place during this period fell (-8.74%), indicating that more users made fewer transactions. While total TVL held constant(0.00%), stablecoin TVL dropped(-2.05%), indicating some liquidity exited the system. Total Revenue (-71.14%) and onchain profit (-71.71%) fell a lot, as were paid L1 fees (-54.53%) and txn cost (-50) indicating much less fee activity on chain. This decline in revenue and profit indicates that users were making smaller or less expensive purchases. Increase in active users is promising but decreasing and cheaper transactions signal less valuable use, perhaps less DeFi or cross-chain activity.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
Gm guys
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/07/2025) Active Addresses: 655.21K (-19.34%) Transaction Count: 7.67M (+7.42%) TVL: $9.65B (-7.66%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.91B (-1.26%) Revenue: $365.92K (+50.92%) Paid to L1: $12.27K (+193.58%) Onchain Profit: $353.65K (+48.47%) Transaction Cost: $0.002 (+100.00%) Active addresses fell off a cliffs (-19.34 %), but transaction count reversed (+7.42%) — fewer users but more transactions per user. Both TVL (-7.66%) and stablecoin TVL (-1.26%) also fell as there was a significant outflow of liquidity from the chain. Even so, revenue (+50.92%) and onchain profit (+48.47%) both surged, buoyed by a spike in gas fees. L1 SettlementData: Paid to L1 also increased almost threefold (+193.58%), indicating increasing settlement activity with Ethereum. Transaction cost doubled but still very cheap in comparison.
4 replies
2 recasts
11 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/06/2025) Active Addresses: 812.44K (-8.39%) Transaction Count: 7.14M (+2.88%) TVL: $10.45B (-0.29%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.96B (-0.50%) Revenue: $242.48K (+142.94%) Paid to L1: $4.18K (+1062.71%) Onchain Profit: $238.30K (+139.59%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Active addresses fell (-8.39%) and transaction count rose somewhat (+2.88% ), suggesting fewer users, but more transactions per user. TVL (-0.29%) and stable TVL (-0.50%) both decreased slightly, indicating small liquidity outflow. Revenue (+142.94%) and onchain profit (+139.59%) exploded, despite almost no change in txn cost, courtesy of a gargantuan spike in fees. L1s also paid significantly more (+1062.71%) , showing increased demand, and settlement on Ethereum. The increase in profit and fees, despite fewer users implies larger or more expensive transactions, likely in DeFi or cross-chain activity. Even so, the decline in active users could indicate waning engagement from smaller users.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/04/2025) Active Addresses: 886.82K (-22.86%) Transaction Count: 6.94M (-7.72%) TVL: $10.48B (+0.77%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.98B (+0.25%) Revenue: $99.83K (+2.64%) Paid to L1: $359.61 (-21.94%) Onchain Profit: $99.47K (+2.76%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, the number of active users and transactions dropped, which means fewer people used the network. However, TVL and stablecoins grew a little, showing that users are still holding value on Base. Even with lower usage, revenue and onchain profit went up slightly, and less was paid to L1. âžĄïž Fewer users, but stronger money stats today.
3 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/03/2025) Active Addresses: 1.15M (+25.97%) Transaction Count: 7.52M (+3.58%) TVL: $10.40B (-5.02%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.97B (+0.25%) Revenue: $97.26K (-55.43%) Paid to L1: $460.63 (+4.26%) Onchain Profit: $96.80K (-55.54%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses and transactions increased, meaning more users and activity. However, TVL dropped, showing less total value locked. Revenue and onchain profit fell a lot (-55%), meaning lower earnings. Meanwhile, fees paid to L1 increased slightly.
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/02/2025) Active Addresses: 913.00K (-3.68%) Transaction Count: 7.26M (-2.81%) TVL: $10.95B (+3.30%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.96B (+4.21%) Revenue: $218.15K (+90.30%) Paid to L1: $441.83 (-81.97%) Onchain Profit: $217.71K (+94.10%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses and transaction count decreased, meaning fewer users and fewer transactions. However, TVL and stablecoin TVL increased, which shows more value locked in the network. Revenue and onchain profit almost doubled, a strong positive sign. At the same time, the amount paid to L1 dropped a lot (-81.97%), reducing costs.
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (03/31/2025) Active Addresses: 947.86K (-7.04%) Transaction Count: 7.47M (+8.26%) TVL: $10.60B (-0.47%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.80B (-2.56%) Revenue: $114.62K (+26.53%) Paid to L1: $2.45K (+651.08%) Onchain Profit: $112.18K (+24.27%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses dropped (-7.04%), but transactions increased (+8.26%), showing more activity from fewer users. TVL slightly decreased (-0.47%), and stablecoin TVL dropped more (-2.56%), meaning fewer stablecoins are locked. Revenue and onchain profit jumped by over 24%, a strong positive sign. However, the amount paid to L1 spiked (+651.08%), which may mean higher costs
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (03/30/2025) Active Addresses: 1.02M (+28.46%) Transaction Count: 6.90M (+1.77%) TVL: $10.65B (-2.83%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.90B (+0.52%) Revenue: $90.60K (+9.45%) Paid to L1: $326.30 (-29.00%) Onchain Profit: $90.27K (+9.65%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses increased a lot (+28.46%), bringing more activity to the network. Transactions also grew slightly (+1.77%). TVL fell by nearly 3%, but stablecoin TVL grew slightly, showing some stability in the ecosystem. Revenue and onchain profit both increased by about 9-10%, which is a positive sign. The amount paid to L1 dropped by 29%, reducing costs further.
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (03/29/2025) Active Addresses: 794.10K (+0.75%) Transaction Count: 6.78M (-3.97%) TVL: $10.96B (-2.93%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.88B (0.00%) Revenue: $82.78K (-38.37%) Paid to L1: $459.59 (-79.85%) Onchain Profit: $82.32K (-37.66%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses went up slightly, but transactions dropped nearly 4%. TVL fell by almost 3%, showing some funds left Base, while stablecoin TVL stayed the same. Revenue and onchain profit dropped by more than 37%, which means fewer earnings compared to yesterday. However, the amount paid to L1 went down nearly 80%, reducing costs.
7 replies
2 recasts
13 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (03/28/2025) Active Addresses: 788.19K (+7.55%) Transaction Count: 7.06M (+2.02%) TVL: $11.29B (+0.53%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.88B (+1.84%) Revenue: $134.33K (+43.87%) Paid to L1: $2.28K (+439.71%) Onchain Profit: $132.05K (+41.99%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses and transaction counts increased again. This means more people are using Base. TVL and stablecoin TVL also went up, showing good growth in locked funds and stablecoin activity. Revenue and onchain profit grew by over 40%, which is a strong sign of increased network earnings. However, the amount paid to L1 jumped massively (+439.71%), meaning Base spent more on Layer 1 costs.
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””
@am3
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (03/27/2025) Active Addresses: 732.73K (+13.43%) Transaction Count: 6.92M (+1.76%) TVL: $11.23B (-1.75%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.81B (+0.53%) Revenue: $93.41K (-15.76%) Paid to L1: $422.36 (+0.35% Onchain Profit: $92.98K (-15.78%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00%) Summary Today, active addresses increased by 13.43%, and transactions also grew slightly (+1.76%). This means more users were active on Base. However, TVL dropped (-1.75%), but stablecoin TVL rose slightly (+0.53%), showing that stablecoins are still being used. Revenue and onchain profit fell by around 15%, while payments to L1 increased slightly (+0.35%). Transaction costs stayed the same.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions