Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ””

@am3

2335 Following
1369 Followers


Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
6 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
6 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
5 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
3 replies
3 recasts
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/19/2025) Active Addresses: 780.93K (+42.3%) Transaction Count: 5.90M (+7.1%) TVL: $10.02B (+0.20%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.82B (no change) Revenue: $51.30K (−43.1%) Paid to L1: $434.76 (−96.6%) Onchain Profit: $50.86K (−34.4%) Transaction Cost: $0.0008 (−70.4%) Today was better in activity. It was used by more people and the transactions have grown. TVL did increase again, but only marginally. The stablecoin value remained unchanged. Revenue and profit fell despite increased activity. On the other hand, to send data to Ethereum was considerably cheaper. And transaction costs got mc cheaper (−70%) In short: More users and transactions, but the network earned less money. Users benefit from low costs, however.
3 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/18/2025) Active Addresses: 548.46K (−15.08%) Transaction Count: 5.51M (−22.61%) TVL: $9.98B (+0.20%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.82B (+0.26%) Revenue: $90.20K (−48.58%) Paid to L1: $12.72K (+36.06%) Onchain Profit: $77.47K (−53.34%) Transaction Cost: $0.0027 (+35.00%) Base fell again today, in users and transactions. That means people used the network less. Despite the lower activity, the total value locked (TVL) and value of stablecoins increased somewhat. But revenue and profit declined significantly. The network made less money. Transaction fees paid to send data to Ethereum (L1) increased while the average cost of transactions also rose by 35% although remains low. Shorter: Less users and less money earned, but system still has great value.
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

Ahmad.base.ethđŸ”” pfp
@base Onchain Daily Snapshot (04/13/2025) Active Addresses: 1.19M (−7.75%) Transaction Count: 7.61M (−1.42%) TVL: $10.28B (+4.47%) Stablecoin TVL: $3.84B (−0.52%) Revenue: $109.04K (+34.67%) Paid to L1: $327.38 (−91.25%) Onchain Profit: $108.71K (+40.75%) Transaction Cost: $0.001 (0.00) Today fewer people used the network (−7.75%) and did transactions (−1.42% ). However, this reflected into a slight increase (+4.47%) in the total value locked (TVL), suggesting that more money flows into this ecosystem. Value of stablecoins fell slightly (−0.52%) Revenue and profit, however, grew tremendously, which means the network made more money with fewer users. The payment to Ethereum fell significantly (−91.25%) which also increased profit. In short: the network earned more, and also its performance looked better, even if activity slumped somewhat.
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions