Alemac
@alemac
The team says: 'users who tend to only interact with small number of users before becoming hero are typically not selected' This was my case. I nominated someone who was always ignored whenever he gave a chance to farcaster. I thought it would be an incentive for people to interact with him and give him the opportunity to get some connections. But it seems that it is better to repeat a hero than to give the opportunity to new people. I can't agree...
8 replies
5 recasts
19 reactions
👑eiteen go🚀 <3
@eiteengo
I was a top 5-10 Ⓜ️oxie given contributor every day, but my successor nomination was ignored. I also disagree.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Marcelo Terça-Nada 💎🎩✨
@marcelonada
In the previous weeks, they opened two nomination processes: one where the most active heroes could choose a person and another in a general call for the community. It seems to me that last week there was only this second call, but I could be wrong.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
itslemon.eth
@itslemon.eth
Who was it?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NIKOOTINEⓂ️🎯
@nikootine
oW now I get it you nominated someone else, totally agree with you It's not fair at all. It ruins the whole purpose of the project.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rogue
@roguerig
I lost track. Who got repeated?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vsck
@vsck
I would have always thought that rather unknown users would be made heroes to give them a chance to become a bit more well-known, but what can you do?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hogan Prison no 619
@hoganthereformed
Very strange and needs push back for sure
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
Repeat a hero? Where's the logic in that?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
