justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
i'm sure it's been talked about many times over already in /warpcast, but if you'd humor me, is there a reason why a channel `member` doesn't necessarily have to be a channel `follower`? i get why there can be a distinction between `member` and `follower`, but shouldn't a `member` have to be a `follower`? cc @luso
5 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
btw, i can't cast this directly in /warpcast where i think this belongs because i'm not a `member` of the channel π
1 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
Luso
@luso
An even better question: In the following context, what would be your preferred outcome? a) You drop to all users which are members AND followers of the channel b) You drop to all users which are members OR followers OR both
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ese π³
@esss
Right now you canβt invite someone to be a member if theyβre not following
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
patxol π· anser.social
@patxol.eth
I donβt think you can get a member invite if you are not a follower (at least it was blocked at launch) But nothing prevents you from unfollowing once you are a member.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sukiyaki
@sukiyaki-kai
but you follow me. Thanks!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction