agrimony↑🎩 pfp

agrimony↑🎩

@agrimony.eth

1280 Following
3325 Followers
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
its like u cant like anything on there
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
POV: /higher at farcon
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
is this uluru?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
alive yourself
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Hah yes, totally agree that there shouldn't be one universal standard. I made the same point originally. Same standards with minor tweaks are fine if it preserves backward compatibility. Eg ethernet cables have been upgraded from cat 5 to cat 8 over the years. Normies won't know the diff since they all use the same rj45 connectors.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Dunno, If a mod could easily decide, should be easy enough to automate? But yeah point taken on being reactionary. Altho I don't quite see what they're solving for. Did they change the underlying spam filter?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Ah yeah, should be a modified erc20 token that adds function without breaking backward compatibility with existing erc20 protocols. My only problem is that I like non fungibility in some content. Eg different rarity tiers. Not everything should be fungible
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
OK banger
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Kind of, but if review is only done on new accounts then it's easy enough to social engineer by selling verified accounts. You'd need to do retroactive checks, and thus the problem starts to scale
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
You can run your own node to interact with the chain without any 3rd party intermediary
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Vanilla erc20 won't work since it doesn't have tokenuri to point to a content hash I believe. Erc721 indexing also works at scale anyway eg blur. Imo this isn't a technological issue but a psychological one
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
https://warpcast.com/agrimony.eth/0x0d155299
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
this is already being done at scale (same as how all indexers function)? or am i misunderstanding the question
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
a really lucky 3! thought i was cooked after the first miss Framedl PRO 2025-02-23 3/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
yeah thats what token standards are for. no one should be wrangling individual contracts unless they love torturing themselves
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
I miss the nft days 😭
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Partly frontend yes, but also backend (eg decimals, max tokens) Eventually this is decided at the social layer anyway. Just need consensus of the naming terms
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
I agree, but this is less about the token standard and more about the token framing. If u wanna use erc20 for jpgcoin then make them use smallest unfractionable decimals. I rather see 1/1000 eds than 0.001 coin if that makes sense
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
What would be in your poison jar? 1. Licorice
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Yes
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions