adrienne
@adrienne
Question for fc devs: Anytime we want to use any farcaster client that’s not warpcast, we have to sign a transaction to authorize that client to cast on our behalf and/or edit our profile. How come warpcast doesn’t need to ask permission?
6 replies
1 recast
16 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It’s not a requirement. It’s just how people have it designed today for practicality / speed of implementation. cc @woj.eth
2 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
horsefacts 🚂
@horsefacts.eth
You gave permission when you signed up for Warpcast. The $5 sign up fee covers: 1) Registering a new FID 2) Paying for storage 3) Adding an “account key” that authorizes Warpcast to post for you 4) Registering your username When you authorize a new client, you are just doing step 3, adding an account key.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Zach Lipp
@zachlipp
curious the answer on this one, lots of nice alt clients these days, tried Recaster yesterday for first time and Supercast was smooth too
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
woj
@woj.eth
ironically warpcast doesnt index the hubs properly again, so im copy pasting my answer here cc @dwr.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
woj
@woj.eth
warpcast does this for you at the sign up when you create your account through supercast this also happens in the background right now warpcast doesn't even support approving signers from accounts created outside of warpcast, but if it would the UX would be the same but reversed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Neynar
@neynar
you can generate a signer at the time of account creation and thats what warpcast does supercast likely doesnt ask for a separate signer action if you create a new account on supercast @woj.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
