nick.base.eth pfp
nick.base.eth
@nickprince.eth
Recent talent acquisitions are insanely bullish farcaster/warpcast Motivates me to spend more time here (would invest $ if I could) Still grappling with how to split time/attention between here and X. I want to spend more time here but get more engagement there. What do?
17 replies
9 recasts
79 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Would primarily posting here, then posting the link to the cast on X work? And may drive folks over here. This is a pattern (in reverse) that often happens. Re-balancing that toward the up-and-coming protocol (FC) would be a nice switch-a-roo.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

nick.base.eth pfp
nick.base.eth
@nickprince.eth
Does Warpcast penalize or reward sharing links? I think X punishes right?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
In contrast to X Farcaster (explicitly states) it likes links. Open protocol gonna "open protocol" Network lockin is a "real thing" eh?!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

nick.base.eth pfp
nick.base.eth
@nickprince.eth
Where does it state that?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Hmmm, @dwr.eth has said this many times (in interviews and dev meetings I've sat in on)... trying to think of a hard reference I can put my hand on. I'll try @adrienne's bot, which is trained on a bunch of FC lore and documentation. @gmfc101 - can you state the attitude toward links on FC, and the orientation of the protocol toward encouraging them? Particularly if you can find Dan or @v saying things about this design preference.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Dan has said this so many times, most recently the farcaster twitter account posted a note about not penalizing links. @nickprince.eth farcaster loves links. Cast all your links. Zero algo penalty Sorry the bot isn’t answering perfectly- still need to fine tune it.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

nick.base.eth pfp
nick.base.eth
@nickprince.eth
Awesome ty!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction