Had a call with an industry titan in product management yesterday.

He asked me in which ways web3 social can be:
Cheaper, Faster or Better than web2 social?

I had an answer that I thought was compelling, but his follow up questions were challenging.
I'd be (genuinely) curious of what you think is the strongest answer

Building Larry, FOSS via @frames, @framesfun /open-frames to help decentralized social win. a16z CSX23. farcasterchannels.com farcaster.id

none of the replies on this thread answers the questions.

means something.

i view web3/crypto as a modular/non-universal part of the building stack that works well for certain applications. 

not needed for all social networks.

🦙 @alfaca | building fun consumer crypto apps: @offmarket @perl | vc warm intros | fid #539 | resuming /cheesecoin once we hit pmf 🎯

for example, payment for adult industry is actually a problem where centralization caused a one sided shutdown often unlike consumer cases.

handling micro-transactions is another aspect.

but building an instagram clone? not sure what and why stuff have to be on chain at the cost of friction and unclear end user win.

Agree re thread

Agree re modular stack

Question is what, if anything does this stack make better for the average end user? Is it just a tool that speeds up building social apps?