Fair warning: if you keep replying with slop to accounts that don’t follow or engage with you, you’ll end up labeled as spam.

Be thoughtful. The GPT-assisted attempts are obvious.

OK to have a few replies that don’t get any engagement. But if you reply to pretty much every cast and nothing, the problem is most likely you.

No one is entitled to another person’s attention.

PSA: Don't reply with boring, repetitious slop. The occasional drip of moxie isn't worth the spam flag. That /will/ sting.

Dan says: Be thoughtful.
I say: make frens. Same.

🎩🌹

we stir, grow restless | wake.bsky.social

For a reason, I did consider that a few days ago.

It's nonsense to keep it so crowded.

Investor, Trader, & Market analyst. 📊 Web3 explorer👾🟪 Degentleman🎩

Yes, you see a 1-minute-old cast with 100 replies. Like WTF is happening here and how you guys managed yo read and understand it.

>> this couldn't be good<< 

>> not crowded as crowded yet lomg way to go till its really crowded <<

Yes, that's why I abruptly stopped replying to a few people who didn't respond to my replies at first, although it's meaningful >> not to blame them when it is really crowded in the replies & you don't recognize who's really asking and who's trying to take a sip of your milk<<. I don't usually reply with nonsense unless it's a friend and I'm trying to have a little fun.

So make frens first >> then go mad with them.

Ah. Mechanical, likely. That will never go away; it will be more or less visible as farcaster experiments with different economic structures.

Degen caused generalized spam.
Moxie is driving reply level spam.

Just machines crowding around a tiny, tiny incentive.

Yeah, crowded.