nintynick.eth pfp
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
@superanon = "DAO" votes that are actually just snapshot + multisig @uberanon = a truly onchain shared account choose the onchain reality, anon ?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

anon pfp
anon
@superanon
dude, why not come up with something original and if that's impossible, why not ship a farcaster client for hats? you're just copying then dunking. and you didn't even ship what 33bits has, either. are we really out of positive-sum vibes?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nintynick.eth pfp
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
we did - it is an in-frame client that lets you post via shared accounts: https://warpcast.com/nintynick.eth/0xad37e69d @uberanon is performance art about the risks of centralization and capture
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

anon pfp
anon
@superanon
there's no anonymity set to speak of. you've just fragmented the ecosystem, and I guess liquidity too? is that it?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

nintynick.eth pfp
nintynick.eth
@nintynick.eth
read a bit deeper, anon
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

anon pfp
anon
@superanon
can you at least recognize that we're critical thinkers that can spot this is just a Hats demo, capitalizing on the latest meta? and you're dumping out a copycat token? the onus is on you to justify this.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

4n0n pfp
4n0n
@4n0n
your idea is the original one?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

anon pfp
anon
@superanon
not at all, it's clearly someone putting a lot of work into a complete client with this, not just vampiring off warpcast. again, pointing out that 33bits is actually the furthest, and there wasn't any need for interference until superanon casting built up this meta. unless you think your action did all of this?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction