foobar

@0xfoobar

82 Following

2051 Followers

foobar pfp

Yep, check out clusters.xyz

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

h/t @0xfoobar https://x.com/0xfoobar/status/1802691495016747264

2 replies

1 recast

11 reactions

foobar pfp

One key thing, doing a modified harberger (capped demand-based renewal fees) that still gives min guarantee ownership times, overcoming the primary harberger failure mode

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

foobar pfp

2 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

foobar pfp

More details here: https://docs.delegate.xyz/delegate/upgrade-to-v2/subdelegations

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

foobar pfp

Checks are still dead-simple, one function. `checkDelegateForAll(hotWallet, accountOwner, "warpcast")` returns true if people have delegated that specific rights string or if they've delegated the empty rights string. So granularity doesn't add complexity for integrators.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

foobar pfp

One thing I'd add that you might not be aware of (since it didn't exist in V1) is subdelegation rights. Users can delegate for a specific usecase without delegating their entire wallet, as some might want. Just a matter of using a specific bytestring for the `rights` param, I'd recommend "warpcast"

2 replies

0 recast

5 reactions

foobar pfp

Looks clean. As long as Farcaster Hubs are verifying EVM events already should just be one to listen to. Or there’s onchain enumeration so no event indexing even required

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

foobar pfp

Yes that’s right

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

Delegate v2 from @0xfoobar 👀

0 reply

1 recast

5 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

@0xfoobar — there’s a proposal from @sanjay and @horsefacts.eth to support verifications from delegate, curious if you have thoughts on the implementation https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/109

2 replies

1 recast

4 reactions

foobar pfp

What does this mean @dwr.eth

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

foobar pfp

random devs will make a m*tam*sk hotwallet address, call themselves a bridge, and then people send hundreds of millions to dollars to it then one day they lose their seed phrase and go "oh no our bridge has been hacked! the force majeure strikes again!"

1 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

foobar pfp

It's insane when people compare Threads to Clubhouse Absolutely zero ability to distinguish between an upstart app by a couple guys with no execution experience and a targeted killshot by the established leader in social over the past decade

3 replies

1 recast

6 reactions

foobar pfp

Elon pissed me off enough I'll probably start crossposting all the quality stuff here

22 replies

6 recasts

86 reactions

foobar pfp

Happy Fourth of July!

2 replies

0 recast

5 reactions

foobar pfp

Easier to get engagement on memes than text, and so Gresham's Law kicks in for all content creators at scale

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

foobar pfp

I think a certain genre of social network, be Twitter/Warpcaster/a secret third thing, would do better to be text-only instead of giving users multimedia options. Obviously this doesn't work for an Instagram, but there's a prisoner's dilemma defection that crowds out quality conversation

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

foobar pfp

we're not integrated into Lens yet but working on it!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

foobar pfp

ah nice. what about letting each user set their own parameters, much like telegram? could be 1 week, 1 month, or 1 year

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction