Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
if elections were onchain, you could set conditions to allow people to see who you voted for. https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x5abf0c04ab7196e2bdd19313b479baebd9f7791b/292
4 replies
2 recasts
34 reactions

jon pfp
jon
@sweetleaf.eth
we should absolutely be voting onchain - fully verifiable - on mobile, turnout would approach 100% - testnets to try out alternative voting systems (runoff, quadratic, proportional representation) in tandem with mainnet voting it's far too efficient for the powers that be to ever let it happen though
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gFam.live (UrbanGladiator) pfp
gFam.live (UrbanGladiator)
@gfam
I think that's not great for democracy, then people would pay others to vote a certain way. With the current private method, someone could try and pay you for your vote but they have no way of knowing if you actually did or not - so it disincentivizes that behaviour.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Alex Van De Sande  pfp
Alex Van De Sande
@avsa
To be able to prove how you voted is precisely what we DON’T want in a democracy. Provable secrecy is the hard thing, not the other way around
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico🦊 pfp
Nico🦊
@nicom
Telling what you voted for is just illegal in my country.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction