Davide pfp
Davide
@0xdavide
🚀In the "retail" context for next-generation blockchains, the focus is increasingly on the ability to process a high number of transactions per second (TPS), a crucial aspect for both protocols (gaming, micropayments, the need to make many transactions quickly) and users (low fees). In this context, several platforms emerge that stand out for their approach to improving throughput, leveraging specialized virtual machines. ✔️High Throughput 🅴🆅🅼: platforms based on the Ethereum Virtual Machine, such as Hyperliquid (not yet fully EVM), Monad, MegaETH, Berachain, Sonic, Unichain, Rise, Ithaca and Nil that focus on the optimization and scalability of the Ethereum ecosystem. ✔️High Throughput 🆂🆅🅼: solutions that use the Solana Virtual Machine such as Eclipse, Soon, Atlas and Fogo, focused on intensive parallelism.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Davide pfp
Davide
@0xdavide
✔️High Throughput 🅼🆅🅼: chains such as Sui and Aptos, which adopt the Move Virtual Machine. Move is a programming language, initially developed by Meta (Facebook) for its blockchain Diem (Libra). ✔️High Throughput 🆆🅰🆂🅼: chains such as Cosmos Hub, Polkadot, ICP and Near use this technology. Cosmos uses CosmWasm (a variant of the framework SDK), Polkadot for customizable parachain runtimes and Near for running smart contracts written in Rust and AssemblyScript. As I always repeat, "high scalability" is synonymous with "poor security and greater centralization" (trilemma) but who will win the scalability war?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction