So I’d like to take a moment to complain about CSR (contract-secured revenue)

My personal opinion is that it’s a dumpster fire — it provides smart contract devs with a perverse incentive to make code *less* efficient

If you want to redirect sequencer fees to sc devs, tie it to economically useful activity

🤦

Head of Protocol Development @ OpenSea (views are my own)

Another gripe with CSR is that it rewards devs who bake in contract ownership, and punishes devs who want to build true hyperstructures

The goal should be to make it so anyone can deploy your contracts, and that those contracts can operate autonomously without having to include contract owners or special beneficiaries

Yeah, and the “retroactive” component makes it much less gameable (though in a perfect world we’d have some objective options as well)

Optimism RPGF is basically CSR but with more nuance